Re: Juvenile offenders & life sentances
Actually, the original saying in Hebrew translates more as "No more than an Eye for an Eye"; essentially, regular vengeance is fine, but not disproportionate vengeance.
No matter if regular vengeance is okay or not, the purpose of the ideal justice system should be rehabilitation, not retribution. Retribution based punishment came about because many old beliefs had the god(s) punish wrongdoers, and be a bit careless regarding collateral damage, if they weren't mundanely punished. I would be unsuprised if that's where the modern justice system got many of it's roots. Rehabilition of criminals, combined with a relatively light punishment, is almost always more effective than just a big punishment, because threat of punishment only scales in efficiency up to a certain level, while increased rehabilition also only scales to a certain point, but that point is decriminalization. So, alongside adults, the punishment of adolescents and below should be focused on rehabilitation. Life sentences are not conductive to rehabilitation.
Originally posted by Briton
View Post
No matter if regular vengeance is okay or not, the purpose of the ideal justice system should be rehabilitation, not retribution. Retribution based punishment came about because many old beliefs had the god(s) punish wrongdoers, and be a bit careless regarding collateral damage, if they weren't mundanely punished. I would be unsuprised if that's where the modern justice system got many of it's roots. Rehabilition of criminals, combined with a relatively light punishment, is almost always more effective than just a big punishment, because threat of punishment only scales in efficiency up to a certain level, while increased rehabilition also only scales to a certain point, but that point is decriminalization. So, alongside adults, the punishment of adolescents and below should be focused on rehabilitation. Life sentences are not conductive to rehabilitation.
Comment