I think you should take a minute and chill.
To elaborate further, this is the same line of reasoning I had at age 15ish, which many members here can confirm as I've been here for like a decade and was super into "telling the truth" about the pointlessness and pain of life. This kind of nihilism is unsustainable, not to mention extremely theatrical. It's all very "boo-hoo witness and tremble before the Bad Thing we have wrought" which is ridiculous. It is simply factually inaccurate to act as though the world is getting worse in terms of human suffering, empathy, and social interconnectivity.
I sense a kind of forlorn nostalgia here for a bygone past that, probably, never actually existed. The climate crisis is a legitimate concern, but let's also awknowledge how responsible a
handful of people and conglomerates are in comparison to the
vast vast majority of humanity. Despite this there have been great strides in government support for sustainability. This is surely a dire concern, but it is the height of privilege, and cowardice, to see an ongoing broken thing and decide to quit rather than attempt to fix it.
One argument which has been made is developing countries contribute disproportionately toward climate change and environmental degradation. This is a complicated premise, and the truth hinges on how
developed one considers China, but is essentially swinging low since developed countries, with their resources have a responsibility to be more responsible. Developing countries of the "global south" argue that they are trying to utilize the easiest path to wealth which modern western countries would be hypocrites to deny them. The point here being that modernization demonstrably improves quality of life for the average person, indirectly through improvements to economics, infrastructure, and society, as well as directly through greater and more diverse food availability, medical assistance, and general safety.
Quality of life overall has improved dramatically compared to the historic human. People are
more literate, relatively more free, relatively more educated, and live longer, healthier, relatively more happy lives in a world where extreme poverty is relatively lower, and these things are all
still improving. We live in a world which is amazingly relatively
more peaceful than the vast majority of human existence. I've elaborated at length
here and
here about how overpopulation is not really a strong concern based on available demographic data.
Have you considered taking to some young people, or activism, or joining a community garden even? Almost everyone I know is extremely concerned about the climate crisis and many of them are making every effort in their lives to improve the world. A friend stopped by yesterday with a big box of fresh vegetables from a community gardening initiative we bought into; the three of us pay $10 and get a few pounds of vegetables and the organization donates vegetables to families in need.
I feel this misanthropic nihilism is a generational thing. It's something my dad, born in the 1960s, made into his entire personality and it's something I've observed in many older unhappy working class people. Make no mistake, young people are nihilistic too, but often significantly more optimistic about it. We are keenly aware of the enormous challenges which face the modern world and the future of humanity, that is our future. We endeavor to do something about it and even if we fail we will have tried, and in trying we will have stood together in love and strength and told an insurmountable force that we will not back down.
I'm not sure where you get this idea that everyone is mindlessly staring into screens and becoming horrid asocial gremlins. We communicate now more than ever and talking in person somewhat less doesn't invalidate that. I tried to find a source for this, but it's a pain because phones and internet have been such a hot button for decades and google doesn't know what I'm looking for. For comparison though, I talk to maybe... a dozen people or so per day online or through text? My roommate's dad plays bridge online with friends every Tuesday, I have three seperate scheduled days I "hang out" online with friends playing games, watching movies, or just talking. The internet and phone communication is not breaking us apart, but provides a powerful tool for brining us together.
This glorification of the past has put on blinders. Did you think people talked more in the past? That we just were more friendly? With the far more blatant racism, homophobia, and general bigotry that this would encourage us to just read out and get all touchy feely? If people want to ignore others they've always had the choice, for example there's many photos of old timey people on transit or restaurants where every single person has their head buried in the same newsprint. Compare now where I have literally more information at my fingertips than the entirety of Alexandria and I have literally billions of potential new friends I don't even need to be on the same continent with.
I'm going to end off by clarifying traditional values can bugger off. I'm a queer person and a witch. I have a number of privileges I will readily awknowledge as a white American mostly male- presenting person, but traditional values have done little except hurt me and my communities. I dislike these made up rules that appeal to our division (only associate with the right kind of people, ethnic quarters, class stratification), which deny our humanity (Jews will not replace us, slave laws, islamophobia, asian hate, Irish need not apply), and contribute to generational, institutional structures that prevent social improvement.
I'll also fully admit to hedonism, I don't consider enjoying things to be a moral failing. I think of very few things to be a moral failing actually. I firmly believe people can enjoy the products of modern life with the cognizance that they must also be vigilant and aware of it's impact. If you want to rant about conspicuous consumption, direct it toward something useful and realize it's hardly a product of modern civilization. There are legitimate issues which arise from modern life, but for the most part they're issues we've always had that are stretched in new ways.
The world is not a bad place. It doesn't need to be, it *shouldn't* be, and it won't be. Even if the collective humanity burns down the world there will still be kind hearted people huddled in the ashes willing to extend a hand. If humans are to go extinct, we'll go out as we came in, gathered around one another in the night, laughing, crying, sharing what we have. The world will go on.
Human existence is not the problem. We are a product of the divine earth as much as any other creature. Our possession of reason means we have a greater responsibility, which I agree that we as a collective are failing. We are a species in our infancy and a child who breaks something isn't thrown from a cliff, they're reprimanded and told to do better. Ive almost certainly missed some point, but I'm tired of typing. If the world is so awful, then do something about it.
Bookmarks