Re: What's the difference between the two?
The only comparison you made was manner of selection. That certainly doesn't constitute calling them completely different. The rest was all just random information that referred to both druidry and shamanism in a non-comparative fashion. Then you end your statement by theorizing that only neo-druidry/shamanism can be called similiar (despite having just used "similar" to describe an aspect of both druidry and shamanism in an above paragraph) without ever stating which incredibly specific version of either YOU were originally going on about. I, for one, would be enormously curious to hear how "shaman" is being defined in this context because the word itself was mostly invented to describe a method of practice and not a religion.
Fyi: All of this snobbery looks like nothing more than nonsense to anyone outside of your elite club.
Originally posted by monsno_leedra
View Post
Fyi: All of this snobbery looks like nothing more than nonsense to anyone outside of your elite club.
Comment